U4 Issue, Dec. 2014, No. 10 - Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of governance and anti-corruption activities
Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of governance and anti-corruption activities
Author: Jesper Johnsøn, Senior Advisor, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute
U4 Issue, December 2014, No. 10
Abstract:
Author: Jesper Johnsøn, Senior Advisor, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute
U4 Issue, December 2014, No. 10
Abstract:
Cost-effectiveness  and cost-benefit analysis methods are currently underutilised in  evaluations of governance and anti-corruption reforms in developing  countries. This limits opportunities to inform policy and may lead to  suboptimal reform choices and programme designs. In general, complicated  interventions such as national anti-corruption strategies or  anti-corruption agencies do not lend themselves easily to cost-analysis  approaches, often due to the challenge of measuring the impact in terms  of reduced corruption. However, cost-effectiveness analysis – and in  some cases cost-benefit analysis – of sector programmes with inbuilt  anti-corruption measures is a useful tool for guiding decision makers as  they choose between alternative integrity measures and assess the  return on investment. Cost-benefit analysis hinges on an ability to  translate outcomes into a monetary value, something most feasible with  public finance–related interventions. Where outcomes cannot be  monetised, there are still opportunities for cost-effectiveness  analysis. Two impact evaluation designs are presented that make use of  cost-effectiveness analysis to overcome corruption measurement  challenges. Using such designs, the value of anti-corruption activities  can be evaluated even without measuring corruption.