Changes to Victoria's anti-corruption commission way short, say advisers
[Facilitator's note: Thank you to Charmaine Rodrigues, Constitutional Assistance and Political Dialogue Specialist, Bureau for Policy and Programme Support, UNDP New York, for sharing this information.]
Key former advisers to the state government have rejected proposed changes to its anti-corruption commission, arguing they do not go far enough and Victoria would be left with a defective integrity regime ill-equipped to fight corruption. "Even if the legislation is amended as proposed, it will still fall far short of the ICAC model," says former Supreme Court judge Stephen Charles, QC, has completed the first expert assessment of proposed amendments to the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission. "The IBAC will continue to be inadequately armed to expose corruption and severely constrained in its efforts."
Read the story by Royce Millar in The Age.
Key former advisers to the state government have rejected proposed changes to its anti-corruption commission, arguing they do not go far enough and Victoria would be left with a defective integrity regime ill-equipped to fight corruption. "Even if the legislation is amended as proposed, it will still fall far short of the ICAC model," says former Supreme Court judge Stephen Charles, QC, has completed the first expert assessment of proposed amendments to the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission. "The IBAC will continue to be inadequately armed to expose corruption and severely constrained in its efforts."
Read the story by Royce Millar in The Age.